# OpenSearch vs Wakupator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenSearch | Wakupator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 41 in Search Engines | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 13 929 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.19.7 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenSearch scores 76/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.

OpenSearch ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenSearch is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.

OpenSearch is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenSearch](https://selfhost.directory/project/opensearch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opensearch.md)
- [Wakupator](https://selfhost.directory/project/wakupator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wakupator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opensearch-vs-wakupator