# OpenSearch vs OTOBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenSearch | OTOBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 41 in Search Engines | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 13 932 ✓ | 340 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 2.19.7 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Perl |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenSearch scores 76/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.

OpenSearch ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OTOBO.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenSearch is easier to run; OTOBO needs more configuration.

OpenSearch is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenSearch](https://selfhost.directory/project/opensearch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opensearch.md)
- [OTOBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/otobo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/otobo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opensearch-vs-otobo