# OpenScribe vs Wealthfolio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenScribe | Wealthfolio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Healthcare | #5 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 223 | 9 285 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +239 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 | v3.11.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Wealthfolio scores 73/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.

Wealthfolio ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.

If you want the quickest setup, Wealthfolio is easier to run; OpenScribe needs more configuration.

Wealthfolio is growing faster right now (+239 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenScribe](https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe.md)
- [Wealthfolio](https://selfhost.directory/project/wealthfolio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wealthfolio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openscribe-vs-wealthfolio