# OpenScribe vs Umbraco CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenScribe | Umbraco CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Healthcare | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 223 | 5 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +21 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenScribe is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenScribe](https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe.md)
- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openscribe-vs-umbraco-cms