# OpenScribe vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenScribe | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 223 | 118 293 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 934 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 934 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenScribe](https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openscribe-vs-tradingagents