# OpenScribe vs Shields

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenScribe | Shields |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Healthcare | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 223 | 27 331 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +125 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Shields scores 80/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.

OpenScribe ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.

If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; OpenScribe needs more configuration.

Shields is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenScribe](https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe.md)
- [Shields](https://selfhost.directory/project/shields) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shields.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openscribe-vs-shields