# OpenScribe vs QloApps

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenScribe | QloApps |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 223 | 14 451 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | OSL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

QloApps scores 68/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.

OpenScribe ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.

QloApps is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenScribe](https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe.md)
- [QloApps](https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openscribe-vs-qloapps