OpenReadervszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with