# OpenReader vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-windows-arm