OpenReadervsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with