OpenReadervsweb-check
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | web-check | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 3 in OSINT |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 35 283 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +372 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
web-check scores 81/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
web-check is growing faster right now (+372 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →web-check details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep web-check, compare it with