# OpenReader vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 1 718 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader and UUSEC WAF score the same (59/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-uusec-waf