OpenReadervsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader and UUSEC WAF score the same (59/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with