OpenReadervsTuleap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Tuleap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #11 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 550 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |
Which one should you pick?
Tuleap scores 64/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tuleap.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Tuleap needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Tuleap details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Tuleap, compare it with