# OpenReader vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 549 | 117 655 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +5 296 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-tradingagents