# OpenReader vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 24 039 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +779 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-temporal