OpenReadervsTeleport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Teleport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 6 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Teleport scores 76/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
Teleport is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Teleport details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Teleport, compare it with