# OpenReader vs Deta Surf

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | Deta Surf |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #21 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 3 613 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader and Deta Surf score the same (59/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Deta Surf.

If you want the quickest setup, Deta Surf is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [Deta Surf](https://selfhost.directory/project/surf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/surf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-surf