OpenReadervssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 549 | 45 666 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 21 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | search-syntax@1.0.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for OpenReader.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →sentry details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep sentry, compare it with