# OpenReader vs sandboxed.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | sandboxed.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 672 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for sandboxed.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-sandboxedsh