OpenReadervsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 33 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →rushdb details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep rushdb, compare it with