# OpenReader vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 4 508 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

rudderstack scores 63/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-rudderstack