OpenReadervsRembg
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Rembg | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 25 216 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +77 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Rembg scores 78/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Rembg.
If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
Rembg is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Rembg details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Rembg, compare it with