# OpenReader vs RabbitMQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 13 949 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +78 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for RabbitMQ.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-rabbitmq