# OpenReader vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 550 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-qwc2