# OpenReader vs Questarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | Questarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #38 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 703 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [Questarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-questarr