# OpenReader vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 588 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-qm-music