# OpenReader vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 6 970 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +229 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pulse scores 71/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

Pulse is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-pulse