# OpenReader vs Pterodactyl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | Pterodactyl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #5 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 9 438 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +184 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Pterodactyl scores 75/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.

Pterodactyl is growing faster right now (+184 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [Pterodactyl](https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-pterodactyl