# OpenReader vs Proxmox Kubernetes Engine

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | Proxmox Kubernetes Engine |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 550 ✓ | 244 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [Proxmox Kubernetes Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-proxmox-kubernetes-engine