OpenReadervsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 27 733 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +55 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 20 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
OpenReader details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with