OpenReadervsPlane
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Plane | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 61 644 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +1 797 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Plane scores 86/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Plane.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Plane needs more configuration.
Plane is growing faster right now (+1 797 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Plane details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Plane, compare it with