OpenReadervsPixelFed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | PixelFed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #11 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 7 131 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
PixelFed scores 64/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for PixelFed.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.
OpenReader details →PixelFed details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep PixelFed, compare it with