# OpenReader vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenReader | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 61 801 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +1 489 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openreader-vs-penpot