OpenReadervsPDFMathTranslate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | PDFMathTranslate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 9 in Translation |
| GitHub stars | 549 | 37 990 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +278 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PDFMathTranslate scores 80/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PDFMathTranslate.
If you want the quickest setup, PDFMathTranslate is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
PDFMathTranslate is growing faster right now (+278 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →PDFMathTranslate details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep PDFMathTranslate, compare it with