OpenReadervsOutpost
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Outpost | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #50 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 1 074 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.7.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 58/100 for Outpost, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Outpost.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Outpost needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Outpost details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Outpost, compare it with