OpenProjectvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenProject | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Project Management | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 16 810 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +609 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 6 |
| Latest release | v17.9.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
OpenProject scores 79/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
OpenProject ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenProject is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
OpenProject is growing faster right now (+609 stars in 30 days).
OpenProject details →Urbit details →