OpenProjectvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenProject | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Project Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 16 800 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +599 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 6 |
| Latest release | v17.9.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OpenProject scores 79/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
OpenProject ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenProject is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
OpenProject is growing faster right now (+599 stars in 30 days).
OpenProject details →Tube Archivist details →