OpenPLC Runtime v4vsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenPLC Runtime v4 | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 418 | 56 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.3.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 52/100 for OpenPLC Runtime v4, so it is the safer default.
OpenPLC Runtime v4 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; OpenPLC Runtime v4 needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
OpenPLC Runtime v4 details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenPLC Runtime v4, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with