# openobserve vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openobserve | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 22 562 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +445 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

openobserve scores 78/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; openobserve needs more configuration.

openobserve is growing faster right now (+445 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openobserve](https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openobserve-vs-wbo