# openobserve vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openobserve | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 22 584 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +463 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

openobserve scores 78/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

openobserve is growing faster right now (+463 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openobserve](https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openobserve-vs-uusec-waf