# openobserve vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openobserve | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 22 592 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

openobserve scores 78/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for Urocissa.

openobserve is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openobserve](https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openobserve-vs-urocissa