# openobserve vs TraceRoot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openobserve | TraceRoot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 22 589 ✓ | 1 142 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +468 ✓ | +30 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openobserve scores 78/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.

openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TraceRoot.

If you want the quickest setup, openobserve is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.

openobserve is growing faster right now (+468 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openobserve](https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve.md)
- [TraceRoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/traceroot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traceroot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openobserve-vs-traceroot