# OpenMediaVault vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenMediaVault | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 7 042 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenMediaVault scores 72/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; OpenMediaVault needs more configuration.

OpenMediaVault is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenMediaVault](https://selfhost.directory/project/openmediavault) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openmediavault.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openmediavault-vs-upptime