# OpenMapTiles vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenMapTiles | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; OpenMapTiles needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenMapTiles](https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openmaptiles-vs-workout-cool