OpenMapTilesvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenMapTiles | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenMapTiles scores 65/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; OpenMapTiles needs more configuration.
OpenMapTiles is growing faster right now (+41 stars in 30 days).
OpenMapTiles details →WBO details →