# OpenMapTiles vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenMapTiles | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 ✓ | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | C |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenMapTiles scores 65/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.

UrBackup ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.

## Details

- [OpenMapTiles](https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openmaptiles-vs-urbackup