# OpenMapTiles vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenMapTiles | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.

OpenMapTiles ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; OpenMapTiles needs more configuration.

OpenMapTiles is growing faster right now (+41 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenMapTiles](https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openmaptiles-vs-upptime