OpenMapTilesvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenMapTiles | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 | 56 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; OpenMapTiles needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).
OpenMapTiles details →Typst details →