# OpenMapTiles vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenMapTiles | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 | +302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; OpenMapTiles needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenMapTiles](https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openmaptiles-vs-stash